Francisco's Journal an author discusses the art of writing

June 22, 2014

Some Anguished Thoughts on Self-Promotion

Filed under: Awards,Integrity,Praise,self-promotion,Soul,Uncategorized — Francisco Stork @ 9:57 am

How and when did it happen that the art of writing did not end when the novel was finished but continued on to the promotion of the work and its author? And if you believe that self-promotion is now a necessary part of the process of creation, does it have an effect on the writing? Does the quality of the writing diminish if when you start to write you see the process you are embarking on ending not in the completion of a work you love but in the work being loved? What I would like to do for a few minutes in this journal entry is explore that uncomfortable feeling that comes from the act of self- promotion. I am calling “self-promotion” all activities done by the author after the work is finished to sell the book and also to increase the author’s reputation and name recognition. I am lumping together a whole bunch of activities, I know. I’m calling self-promotion anything from attending a conference to talk about diversity, let’s say, because my book has Latino characters to notifying Facebook friends of a favorable review. I’m not saying this is good or bad, necessary or not, accepted and standard behavior or not. I want to talk about why it feels “strange” somehow – to me. There’s a part of me that honestly feels that my books are worth reading, that they have value, and promoting the book is an act of sharing not very different from wanting others to know about the great book I just read. And yet this knowledge does not take away that funny feeling, that funny smell of “ego” that comes with self-promotion. I only speak for myself here, but I think it is good for me to recognize the existence of this feeling and ask if it is trying to tell me something.

One of the things I’ve noticed in myself is that the motivation to write is different from the motivation to be read. The first is not unlike that anticipatory joy I had when, as a child, I could be alone and play with my plastic action figures. An hour or two lay ahead of me where I could imagine and pretend, unwatched and undisturbed, to my heart’s content. The desire to create is as simple and uncomplicated as child’s play. The wish to be read is more complicated. This latter wish can include the wish to be loved and accepted, the incredibly powerful need to be special in our own eyes and in others. And it can also be based on generosity, on the willingness to return goodness received and to share hard-earned craftsmanship and learning and wisdom.The problem (if I can use a word that is in itself problematic) is that the “impurity” (another very problematic word, I know) of the wish to be read affects (one can say “contaminates” to continue with the use of loaded words) the rather pure desire to create. The more I yield to, the more I actualize, the more I pay attention to wanting to be read, the less joy there seems to be in the act of writing. It is as if I were no longer alone as I played with my action figures but was in a room with adults who, although occupied with their own conversation, could hear and watch me play. My play is no longer uninhibited, sincere. It is tempered by the potential listeners nearby. And so it is with writing when the fan or the award or the future Facebook post makes its presence felt as I write.

I’ve come to understand a little better the nature of that uncomfortable feeling that comes with self-promotion. I don’t have a name for it, exactly. But I know that it is a loss of sorts. I can’t get away from feeling that every time I do it I am chipping away at something that needs to be solid, loosening boundaries of something that should be firm, damaging a fragile whole that needs to be protected for the sake of the next act of creation.

I’m not sure I have any great solutions. The fact that I am writing to be read makes self-promotion inevitable. I look for ways to protect the child at play as I talk about the author and his books. I try to keep in mind the self-less motives of wanting to be read: to touch, to awaken, to teach, to delight. The act of writing will always encompass the desire to be read. Even when writing in the journal no one will ever read, we are writing to someone, for someone. For me, it is not possible to give the deepest part of me, which is the best gift I can give any readers I may have, without in some way listening to and attending to the little voice of discomfort that comes with self-promotion.

May 11, 2014

The Diversity Discussion

Filed under: Diversity,Latino Issues,Uncategorized,Writing,Young Adult Literature — Francisco Stork @ 8:53 am

Now and then I get asked to talk to about the need for diversity in young adult literature. These days, when the need for diverse books is being so prominently discussed, I have tried to understand why these talks are so hard for me. I have the sense when I show up that there’s nothing new I can say. Doesn’t everyone already know how vital is to for a young person to see him/herself in the books he/she reads? Isn’t it obvious how much we need all young persons to see how we are all the same deep down? Surely, everyone understands how empathy, how living in the mind and life of another, destroys racial and ethnic stereotypes. What more is there to say about the need for diverse books? So I talk about my birth in Mexico, my crossing to the United States when I was nine, my growing up in El Paso Texas, to explain why I naturally write about young Mexican-Americans. My characters are good role models, I think, despite (or because of) their human frailties. I’m sure their existence has helped kids, Latino and non-Latino, to understand themselves and others, but do I really have profess out loud that this is one of the reasons I write? Can I just say that I write about Latino kids because that’s what comes out? Ismael, Hector, Marcelo, Pancho, Vicky, they are just there, first as small seeds and then they grow slowly over the years in my mind and then they are born. I’m just the Stork here. I don’t create my characters. I simply deliver them. And sometimes, the characters that I deliver are white kids like D.Q. and Wendell and, I confess, I don’t do a lot of research about their culture to make sure I get them right.
These talks are so hard because there’s so much about what is being discussed that I don’t know. I’m just trying to write some stories. To a lot of the questions that I get at these talks I have to say, I don’t know. I honestly don’t know. Why aren’t there more books about and by Persons of Color being published? I don’t know. The literary agents and the publishers and editors I personally know all love good diverse books and they go out of their way to find them. Some of them, as was (and is) the case with me, are willing to spend the effort and time needed to develop a book with potential into a good book. Is it a question of money, then, as so many seem to say? POC books don’t sell. I don’t know. My wife had a group of her Wellesley College students over to the house for lunch and I asked them: Do you think the Harry Potter books would have been less popular if Harry had been a Person of Color? The white students mostly said no, the Latino kids said yes. I don’t know. And if J.K.Rowling decided to re-publish her series but this time Harry’s parents were African, what else would she need to change besides Harry’s skin color? His speech? The way he thinks? Would he still be brave? So much of the diversity discussion is, ironically, divisive. Us. Them. You can’t possibly understand. Ironic because what good literature does best is unite by revealing glimpses of the soul that is the same in all. In the end, it comes down to you and me. What can I do? What can you do so there are more good diverse books written and read? That’s what I end up saying at my diversity talks. What I Francisco Stork can do is try to write good books, try to write books that will last, try to write books with the kind of characters that come naturally to me, that are in me waiting to be born, try to write books that speak to all. I can encourage kids of color to work seriously, patiently, at the craft of writing. I can, time permitting, help young writers with their manuscripts. And maybe, I’m not sure about this at all, but maybe, I need to keep on talking to groups, hard as it is, about the need for diverse books.

February 6, 2014

What I Learned About Depression

Filed under: Characters,Depression/Bipolar,Religion,Uncategorized,Upcoming Work — Francisco Stork @ 11:43 am

For the past three years I’ve been working on a novel about a young girl who suffers from depression. The idea, as it was first proposed to me by Cheryl Klein, my editor, was to depict an “organic depression” as opposed to a depression that is caused by a particular traumatic event. As it turns out, Vicky ends up having a depression that is both organic and situational in that the natural mourning after her mother’s death six years before turns into an abiding and debilitating depression. In any depression, the chemical origins and the life stressors are hard to separate. There are people and events in Vicky’s life that are stressful but there is no ongoing trauma. Her family is well-off. She attends an exclusive private school. She is the first to admit that she is very privileged. And yet one evening she swallows enough sleeping pills to end her life. The book starts on the day after her suicide attempt and follows her stay at the hospital, her stay at a “recovery” ranch and her return home. Vicky’s story is the story of her struggle to “be friends with life.” Whether she succeeds or not is the driving tension of the book.
I’m one of those who agree with Ursula K. Le Guin that “one of the things fiction does is lead you to recognize what you did not know before.” I thought I knew about depression before I started writing the book (my long-time experience with this illness was why I agreed to write it), but there were attitudes, feelings thoughts about depression that I now recognize for the first time. (The fact that it has taken me three years trying to “get it right” is some indication of both the complexity of the illness as well as, perhaps, a personal hesitancy to go deeply into the dark belly of the whale). I found out, for example, about the heavy, dragging weight of pretending you are “okay”. I discovered the anger and frustration that depression can evoke in others. Most of all, I glimpsed at some of the tools needed to, if not overcome, at least live and function with depression. Yes, medication is needed. Medication is essential in organic depression. But along with medication, surviving depression in the long term requires a shift in the way we see the world. I’m going to call this shift “accourage” because it consists partly in accepting that life is hard (abandoning the expectation that it should be easy and totally likeable) and partly in courageously proceeding to try to be useful, as best we can, despite life’s hardness. But how do we get accourage? What I learned from writing this book is that accourage comes eventually from the daily decision to live for an ideal. What ideal? It’s up to you. You create the ideal you want to live for. An ideal is an image of who you want to be. It is more than a belief system or a moral code in that an ideal tugs at your heart and soul and not just your mind. The ideal can be based on myth or religion or history or your imagination. You choose it and then you do your best to embody it. The only rule is that the ideal you follow has to be large enough, better enough, true enough to what is best in you and human kind to exert a pull on you and fill you with hope. The ideal has to be worthy enough for you to want to be like.  Gustav Jung said about patients in the second half of life that “there has not been one whose problem in the last resort was not that of finding a religious outlook on life.”  This is what I most learned about depression from writing my book: that learning to live with and even prevail against depression depends on finding a “religious” ideal. Religious not necessarily in the traditional sense of a faith in a body of beliefs, but religious in the root meaning of the word, re-ligare, as in we need to re-connect, bind ourselves, with mind, heart, soul and strength with an image that embodies kindness, and courage and sacrifice and dedication. An image of someone  greater and deeper and truer than our hurting selves.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress